Related News

techUK calls for ring-fenced funding for digital health

techUK calls for ring-fenced funding for digital health

The UK government and NHS England should ring-fence funding for digital transformation in health and social care says a techUK report.
‘Ping and book’ cancer screening service to launch via NHS App

‘Ping and book’ cancer screening service to launch via NHS App

Women will be sent invitations for cancer screening via the NHS App as part of a new “ping and book” service, NHS England has announced.
Universal Care Plan expanding to include diabetes and chronic pain

Universal Care Plan expanding to include diabetes and chronic pain

The Universal Care Plan, OneLondon’s shared care planning solution, is to expand to include diabetes and chronic pain.

5 Comments

  • We do need an NHS app , but get real, @ this point in time it should be view only and available to all. Please, let’s keep IT real !

  • Hmmmm.
    “Rather than end the 8.00am telephone scramble for GP appointments the app may just shift it online…”

    This is already the case at my own GP practice which uses SystmOne. Canny patients have worked out the exact day and time when the next week’s batch of appointment slots are published online. There’s a mad scramble to book online appointments, not helped when the GPs tell patients to “book a follow up appointment in 2 weeks, knowing full well that there are already no slots available!

    We seem to be reverting to the situation where politicians announce when new services will be generally available before the new business processes and associated enabling technology have been piloted at scale,

    Does this remind anyone of the grand plans and challenging timetables announced for Universal Credit or NPfIT – both of which also had major leadership retention issues?

  • ” But for people to be able to use the app to book appointments – as well as to access records and test results – *their practice first up to hook up to the e-Referral Service and summary care record.* ”

    -why? Neither of these have anything to do with booking GP appointments (eRS is for secondary care) or record access (SCR is only clinician-facing)

  • The problem posed around Patient Access only being able to link up with EMIS practice sites – Evergreen Life is available across EMIS, TPP and Vision and has been for over a year. We are not short of technology that already provides online patient services, and it seems a hefty investment for the NHS app to reinvent the wheel.

    Supporting practices and educating them to promote online services (mentioning PFS face to face, at certain points in their GP visit) is key here and there seems to be no plan to encourage and support people to access the solutions already available.

  • Lots of issues here.

    The practice at which I’m a a patient, like many, operates a callback systems with 100% GP triage. Not everyone likes this, but it works for me and ensure the best use of scarce GP appointments.

    Given that we don’t have the resources in primary care to service the potential demand we have to very careful that we don’t introduce online appointment systems that favour those who probably don’t need to see a GP versus those who do but are less digitally literate.

    I’ve lost track of how the NHS login works. At one time plans seemed remarkable sensible with an intention to use openID – This is the same open standard technology that allows you to logon to many services with your google, facebook or twitter credentials and is fully capable of meeting NHS requirements – This doesn’t mean, and I’m not suggesting, that you should, be able to login to your GP practice with your facebook credentials.

    If they have stuck to this – It was very sensible, so they probably haven’t – Then it would be a simple matter to use your NHS login to connect to any service that chose to trust it, you don’t need a platform for this (although an open platform is not a bad idea) and you only need the NHS App for the creation of your NHS login. You wouldn’t need to connect through it.

    All a service like Livi need to do is to support openID (there are fee open source components that make this trivially easy) and decide it trusts the identity verification provided by the NHS. Somebody tell me that this simple approach has not be screwed up?

    It would seem to make sense for a service like Livi to do this and to expose an API to allow he easy integration of their service into other applications.

Comments are closed.