NHS England says trusts must start using FDP within two years

  • 2 August 2024
NHS England says trusts must start using FDP within two years
  • NHSE has written to trusts informing them that they must begin using the FDP and its analytic products within two years
  • Dame Emily Lawson, NHS England’s chief operating officer, and national transformation director Vin Diwaker wrote to all trust executives and COOs
  • Trusts have been given until Monday 5 August to confirm their plans to adopt the FDP

NHS England has written to trusts informing them that they must begin using the national Federated Data Platform (FDP) and its analytic products within two years.

Dame Emily Lawson, NHS England’s chief operating officer (COO), and national transformation director Vin Diwaker, wrote to all trust executives and COOs asking them to confirm “that [they] plan to adopt the NHS FDP in the next two years”, HSJ reports.

US data analytics giant Palantir was awarded the £330 million contract to provide the FDP in November 2023. NHS England’s orders to effectively make its use mandatory is a significant U-turn from what trusts were initially told at the platform’s launch.

At the time, NHSE said the FDP’s rollout would take place in phases over three years to trusts which found it useful, and that trusts and integrated care systems would not be obliged to adopt it.

In an email bulletin this week dated 29 July 2024, NHS England said the adoption of the FDP was “progressing at pace”, with the “transition stage” of the programme expected to be completed in September 2024 before a move to a “delivery phase”.

Rebecca Llewellyn, FDP programme director at NHSE, said: “It has been a busy couple of months for the programme; transition of trusts to the NHS FDP is progressing at pace with more trusts coming on board every day throughout summer”.

“Our focus will shift to product enhancements and optimisation, wider product adoption and a continued focus on supporting new trusts and ICBs to onboard the NHS FDP,” Llewellyn added.

The letter from Dame Emily and Dr Diwakar, which has been seen by HSJ, calls on each trust to set out when they “envisage adopting already available nationally commissioned local products” accessible through the FDP.

Trusts are asked which “quarter of 2024/25 or 2025/26” this adoption will take place. HSJ reports that the letter includes details of the four “products” available on the FDP. These include:

  • Referral to treatment validation — [which] facilitates RTT pathway accuracy and progression
  • Inpatients care co-ordination solution — [which] streamlines elective care with data insights to improve theatre use and support planning, improves data quality oversight and waiting list validation
  • Outpatients care co-ordination solution — [which] enhances clinic operations with waiting list validation
  • Discharge planning (OPTICA) — [which provides] real-time tracking and task management for patient discharge processes

The letter also requires trusts to appoint a “named lead” for the adoption of the FDP, according to HSJ. It encourages trusts to give “your chief operating officer, or director with responsibility for transformation and improvement” this role, as the “FDP is a transformation offer for the whole of the NHS”.

According to HSJ, trusts have been given until Monday 5 August to confirm their plans to adopt the FDP.

In response, an NHSE spokesperson told Digital Health: “While implementation is still not being mandated, all trusts and ICBs are being asked to provide plans for how they will maximise the benefits of the Federated Data Platform to deliver better joined-up care for their patients within the next two years.

“Detail of these plans will also ensure trusts can be scheduled into the overall delivery time of the programme and be fully supported to realise the benefits of the platform as quickly as possible.

“Where the FDP can provide additional capabilities currently provided by other systems, it is right that we’d expect organisations to fully consider using the platform going forward, as part of their planning, to ensure the best possible patient care while delivering the best value for taxpayers.”

NHS England awarded an £8.5 million contract to consultancy firm KPMG in April this year to “promote the adoption” of the FDP by trusts and ICBs.

The programme received criticism from health secretary Wes Streeting in June 2024, who lamented the “glacial” pace of adoption of the platform, which is planned to enable hospitals to bring together information from different clinical and HR systems in one place.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Sign up

Related News

Pancreatic cancer online tool assesses risk of inheriting disease

Pancreatic cancer online tool assesses risk of inheriting disease

Pancreatic Cancer UK has launched an online tool for families who have lost a loved one to assess their risk of inheriting the disease.
Patients may be able to opt out of sharing their data with the FDP

Patients may be able to opt out of sharing their data with the FDP

NHS England has been informed by lawyers that key aspects of its Federated Data Platform (FDP) lack a legal basis, The Register report.
NHS England to adopt new cyber security framework

NHS England to adopt new cyber security framework

The National Data Guardian and NHS England have announced a new cyber resilience framework for health and social care organisations.

2 Comments

  • It seems a bit disjointed: are the four “solutions” “already developed” related in any way to each other?
    Practical problems.
    1. how is data transferred from the various EPRs (& add-ons) being used by the different Trusts at present for “validation” of RTT & “waiting lists” – without a massive additional workload for scarce IT & clinical staff?
    2. I thought the problem with discharge management was lack of places to which patients could be discharged (plus funding). Will FDP resolve this?
    3. Whose budget pays for this (there are always installation & training costs) at a time when Trusts have apparently been told that financial balance is more important than waiting lists or anything else?

    Still, I suppose it does support my gut feeling that NHSE is pretty inconsistent in its approach to almost everything (making planning dificult if not impossible for those living in the real world) – &, like CfH, thinks it can produce results by the NLOP approach… mandating implementation of programs by organisations who had already either rejected or failed to adopt them.
    (NLOP widely thought to stand for No Longer Our Problem)

  • I’m with the BMJ on this one.
    ICYMI
    https://www.bmj.com/content/386/bmj.q1712

Comments are closed.