NHS IT departments would be forgiven for wondering what their funding is going to look like by the end of the year. One of the features of the healthcare IT market over the past few years has been that many trusts have maintained – or even increased – IT spending and staffing, in order to invest in systems that promise quality and efficiency benefits down the line.
Even so, two rounds of tech funding – and two rounds of nurse tech funding – were needed to stimulate interest in e-prescribing and the roll-out of nursing observations systems. And now the financial climate has grown considerably darker.
At the end of last week, NHS England put out its first package of funding and support to the 29 ‘vanguard’ sites that are to test out new models of care; stressing the importance of technology to their success in the process.
|
|
Yet on Monday, Monitor wrote to acute trusts, urging them to keep their burgeoning deficits under control by cutting back ‘non-essential’ spending and hiring and avoiding over-trading. And now the Health Service Journal is reporting that the Department of Health is about to announce controls on capital spending by NHS providers; which could, logically, hit IT programmes.
All this puts an interesting perspective on Monitor’s decision to investigate the finances of Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and its implementation of Epic. It puts an even more interesting perspective on neighbouring Papworth Hospital’s decision not to go ahead with the same system, as part of what were ambitious, joint, eHospital plans.
Great IT is one thing. Its immediate impact on trust finances is suddenly another. Affordability looks like the coming issue. The spending round is going to be crucial for those ‘paperless’ ambitions.
|