Another week, another period of deafening silence on the fate of the second round of NHS England’s technology fund, aka the ‘Integrated Digital Care Technology Fund.’ Last month, EHI News ran a survey asking trusts how the delay was affecting them. Some said that if there was no news by the end of January, it would be too late for many projects.
That certainly seems to be the message from IT directors that EHI News has spoken to recently. And, as senior reporter Sam Sachdeva establishes in an Insight piece this week, that is having an impact on suppliers. Reasonably, companies in areas identified as priorities by the commissioning board expected an up-tick in business. This has not materialised, potentially leaving them out of pocket. And as frustrated as everybody else.
|
|
Meanwhile, the debate over the merits and demerits of framework contracts has resurfaced with NHS Shared Business Services’ publication of a six lot contract worth up to £1.25 billion. This is meant, in part, to help the 180 trusts in the North, Midlands and East of England that will need to make decisions about the future of some of their core IT in short order, as their National Programme for IT in the NHS contracts come to an end.
But while the promise of a framework contracts is that they will make procurement easier and faster, there are always concerns that it will also push trusts into buying something less than optimal, limit choice, and stifle innovation. On top of which, there are some interesting omissions from the NHS SBS framework. Time will tell what impact it has on the market.
|